Russia’s personalized regime has been able to use the W est as an important guarantor of its stability. It has also been sponging off liberal democracies, in the form of its elite’s personal integration into Western society.

 sEcurity and the world economy is not the only cause for concern. More importantly, both authoritarian systems have found a way to exploit liberal democracy, and both have been quite successful at doing this. Since the fall of Communism, Russia’s personalized regime has been able to use the W est as an important guarantor of its stability. It has also been sponging off liberal democracies, in the form of its elite’s personal integration into Western society.
Putin Ends the InterregnumBlurred Lines Between War and PeaceObserving the authoritarian experiments of these two serious global actors (although one of them has been weakened), as well as their search for an appropriate international role, has made for interesting viewing, revealing several paradoxes: first, the paradox of stability covering up a deeper instability and impending upheavals; second, the paradox of economic growth that is most likely only a brief respite before a precipitous fall; third, the paradox of outward displays of force that conceal inner weakness and disorientation. These paradoxes illustrate that there is a conflict between perceptions and reality in these two authoritarian states. The only question is to what extent they are the results of conscious distortions of reality as opposed to naivety or unwillingness to accept inconvenient truths.Were Arnold Toynbee alive today, a comparison of Russia and China would provide him with ample material for his theories on the rise and fall of civilizations. Perhaps, Samuel Huntington would have revised some of his conclusions on reform from the top and the role of the middle class in modernization. I hope, too, that Francis Fukuyama will have a chance to compare the modern evolutions of Russia and China, and their systems’ struggles for survival, in the upcoming second volume of The Origins of Political Order.The West should be particularly concerned about the future of these two models of the centralized state. The impact that Russia and China have on global security and the world economy is not the only cause for concern. More importantly, both authoritarian systems have found a way to exploit liberal democracy, and both have been quite successful at doing this. Since the fall of Communism, Russia’s personalized regime has been able to use the West as an important guarantor of its stability. It has also been sponging off liberal democracies, in the form of its elite’s personal integration into Western society. This integration has led to the creation of powerful pro-Kremlin lobbying structures that are undermining the normative foundation of liberal democracy (in fact, the Western politicians often don’t even recognize that this is what is happening). It is unclear how the Putin regime will play out after this cooperative 2 and a half hour legnthy discussion .  It's false charm of a trained KGB with an uncanny poker face for the onlooker to discern the legitimacy of the Putin intentions to curtail a disposition of "non-interference,' rather the untrained Trump , easily deceived , by the perhaps wolf and sheeps clothing, aka Vlad Putin, only time will tell if and end to syria war games can happen peacefully ... With natrual gas pipelines and the profiting of lng/oil exporting/ and fueling of ablymissal Europe , it's highly unlikely that the Telerson hopeful narative has any and all hope in playing out in cooperative affair... Perhaps if Russia and the U.s. split the europe lng exports in half, $$ 50/50 , perhaps if they are will to share in profits maybe then a willingness to tame the Russia/U.S retheroic.

jFK’s Russian Conspiracy Kennedy had his own secret back channel with Moscow. It may have kept the superpowers from going to war...But what It really did was, it kept AMERICA OFF ITS TOES, AND rather played in the hands of the Russians the whole time.

JFK’s Russian Conspiracy Kennedy had his own secret back channel with Moscow. It may have kept the superpowers from going to war...But what  It really did was, it kept AMERICA OFF ITS TOES, AND rather played in the hands of the Russians the whole time.   There  needs to be continuity with this distorted Trump delusions thinking he befriend a pirate .  YOu have to understand , we need George Bush in the White House Directing Trump on all foriegin  policy , the nerve this guy Donald has to regurgitate compassion for the Putin over his own founding fathers who stood before him, guys like Lyndon B. Johson, Truman , George Bush sr. and George Bush Jr. who laid a foundation , to diffuse any and all attempts of  the plotting Soviets , which is what they are always  secretly doing , always, behind the scenes its  in the cards , but you see ,Trump doesn't know how to even hold a deck a cards,  without dropping it,.   If you must know, and perhaps you've gone great lengths to study the Soviets , like I have, since it's in my nature as an economist and registered rep, with a series 7 from wall street whom has just be trained to never let your guard down, you see These words that I QUOTE  ,are  IN FACT  uttered from Joseph Stalin's mouth , he goes on to saY THE FOLLOWING, during a secret underground KGB rally, he puts the following statements into heads of the young KGB, " TO defeat a capitalist , is a simple a task, you see a =weak capitalist only works 9am to 5pm, so we shoot them when their  shift ends,  a docile a pig, is how their system defers 90% of their people!  sheeple become hog tied.. " STALIN THEN REARS HIS KGB TROOPS WITH FOLLOWING MASONIC MESSAGE,. HE SAYS , now read closely ..as this next message  STALIN SAYS, appears to be playing out, orchestrated behind scenes so sophiscated is the Soviet , i digress, but STALIN PROCLAIMS,"   Our time will come in 20 or 30 years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie , (the Bush family and other all Other Patriots will becometh the ones we train their sheeple to hate ..) the Patriots  and other trained commanders will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard-of concessions. The capitalistic countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we will smash them with our clenched fist."  SO that is the mark of A KGB , which is what a Putin, the whole idea, with the words , "THEY , (referring to the U.SA. and a befuddled future leader,) will leap at a chance to become friends ... !! """  now what isn't that ironic , because that is What Trump & Tillerson have been trying to do with Vlad Putin,  they were both " LEAPING at another CHance to become friends ," now I ,must admit , I can't tell you how spooky this is whole plot transposed by Stalin is really happening now.  You see how this Trump has been completely mascaraded 

DOCUMENTARY FEATURING GEORGE BUSH JR. & BARACK OBAMA Titled " - MOSCOW'S MOTIVE -"

"War to the hilt between Communism and Capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in 20 or 30 years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard-of concessions. The capitalistic countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we will smash them with our clenched fist.

In a day in early December, one of Moscow’s agents in the United States, working undercover as a journalist for Izvestia, reported a private meeting with the president-elect’s “closest adviser.” The adviser, who met privately with the Russian spy, was Frank, a top Constituent to Robert Kennedy, and hopeful about a significant improvement in relations from the previous administration. He “stressed that was not merely expressing his personal opinion but the position of the future president.”
Now pause there, but doesn't rat trap idea Kennedy had sound a little to similar to the unknown Trump.  I mean this Trump just like Kennedy tries to shame the previous administration because the two "Ladies Men" don't like war. Well Boo Hoo for the sissy JFK and Trump, its the lack of qualification for a president have that demeanor.  You See a leader who is inept and one doesn't understand war , or more importantly , one who doesn't study the enemy , to the untrained eye , they actually lead the country into a more vulnerable position, and unbeknownst to  the Coward , which is what JFK and Trump were and are, unbeknownst to the gulliable leader, they SOVIET has an operation in place, and there is no allying with a Communist, who's totlally diabolical mission is to uproot our , free market , capitalist system , by being, covert and secretive , by any mean necessary  , which what the Soviet Union tries to disguise buy always taking coddle , or sheeple , which is what the Russians refer to as the dumbfounded untrained benevolent American, the one  they despise and also the one they can mold to perfection whereby taking the idiot , which is what JFK and Trump are when it comes to Trade, Currency , Foreign Policy and anything immigration, he seems to not understand anything that has to do with , outside of America.  But just like during the Kennedy Adminstration, the Russians leaped at the incumbent innocent Kennedy, just as they do with Trump , in the same manor,. How back then Robert Kennedy and the KGB met alone, and there was no American record made of the encounter.  .. These days Trump practically meets Putin all alone , for 3hour sessions, and no, excuse me having a Tillerson Russian softy ,  supervising the event doesn't  count either because, he at times is even more unaware that Putin is just a wolf in sheeps clothing. Trump and Tillerson are like two little children , so innocent , it's like what is going on in the room, is Vlad Putin raping the two babies , because that's what it sure seems like,  and its about time our naïve leaders allow for former Secretary of State Conda lizza Rice, whom is "Soviet Expert" Bush Jr. ND
(J F K H A D H I S O W N R U S S I A N B A C K C H A N N E L . I T H E L P E D T O P R E V E N T W A R . JFK HAD HIS OWN RUSSIAN BACK CHANNEL. IT HELPED TO PREVENT WAR.)
John F. Kennedy was not only less hawkish than his public rhetoric, he was less hawkish than the American people.

This is not a report about Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, whose activities during the transition are now being investigated. Nor it is about Jared Kushner, who, the Washington Post reported on Friday, approached Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak last December to propose a secret communications channel. The meeting described above took place in 1960, and the “close adviser” was the incoming president’s brother, Robert F. Kennedy. It is not unusual for the Russians to want to establish contacts with an incoming presidential administration, especially when there is tension between the two countries. It is also not unusual for an American administration to use back channels to probe the intentions of adversarial powers. But December 1960 was not December 2016. The RFK meeting likely came at the request of the Russians, not the Americans. It was not held in secret—it was noted on RFK’s telephone log. And Robert Kennedy, despite general encouraging words, made no promises, suggested no follow-up, and was in no way working against the outgoing Eisenhower administration. The Russians were smart in focusing attention on the president-elect’s brother. He would eventually be involved in historic back channel activity, but well after the inauguration. And all these years later, such communications have been revealed as a canny and patriotic initiative by the Kennedy administration.


The more we learn about it, the more impressive he becomes. Much of the biographical work until recently has been filling in the gaps created by censors—mainly close allies and family members—who did not want the public image of the fallen leader to be tarnished by his addiction to sex and his physical frailties. But what should most dramatically change how we view his presidency is the flood of new information (and some of it not new but underappreciated from Russian records) about how he did his job. JFK had a taping system installed in the White House a decade before Nixon, and these recordings have only been fully opened since late 2012. Unlike the technophobic Nixon, whose taping system would turn on at the literal drop of a hat, Kennedy’s was controlled by a button usually pressed by him alone. The Kennedy tapes, and the increasing release of that era’s national security documents, are revising the picture of a very creative moment in U.S. foreign policy.


(J F K H A D H I S O W N R U S S I A N B A C K C H A N N E L . I T H E L P E D T O P R E V E N T W A R . JFK HAD HIS OWN RUSSIAN BACK CHANNEL. IT HELPED TO PREVENT WAR.)

JFK’s Russian conspiracy did not begin during his campaign. In the summer of 1960, the Soviet Foreign Ministry and the KGB relied mainly on publicly available information to imagine what Kennedy would be like as president if he won. They had no informants near the young leader’s circle, the “New Frontiersmen.” Soviet diplomats were more dismissive than the KGB of Kennedy, thinking him “unlikely to possess the qualities of an outstanding person.” Both institutions worried he was overly influenced by his father, Joseph, the conservative multimillionaire and former head of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Soviet intelligence initially suspected Kennedy might be more welcomingly inventive in U.S.–Soviet relations. But neither side apparently got any help in testing their theories from the Kennedys or their advisers until November.



After Kennedy’s very close election, Soviet diplomats and the KGB made separate approaches to Kennedy insiders to get a read on the future leader of the free world. The meeting of the undercover spy with RFK on Dec. 1, 1960, seemed to be the KGB’s effort to contrive a summit invitation from the president-elect and deliver it on a silver platter to the Kremlin.
Although the Kennedys were new at the White House business, they were not easily impressed by Soviet attention, and they played these approaches carefully, being encouraging only under the right circumstances. The president-elect refused to promise an early summit, though he would not rule one out. “In principle,” the KGB reported RFK as saying in that December meeting:
Kennedy would like to meet with you [Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev] and hopes that his relations with the Soviet leader will be better than Eisenhower had. However, he will not agree to a summit if he doubts that positive results will ensue. In the first three or four months of his presidency, before he has presented his domestic program to Congress, Kennedy would not be able to participate in a summit.
And the Kennedys mixed spice with the sugar. The KGB reported that RFK also warned Moscow not to test the incoming administration over Berlin, a symbol of the administration’s commitment to defending the West. JFK would wait...

{J F K H A D H I S O W N R U S S I A N B A C K C H A N N E L . I T H E L P E D T O P R E V E N T W A R . JFK HAD HIS OWN RUSSIAN BACK CHANNEL. IT HELPED TO PREVENT WAR.}
Kennedy’s Russian conspiracy was designed for personal benefit for the country's interest , for the sake to end the days of bomb scares , and constantly running in fear,  he thought a Russian counter part , so advanced in engineering and space technology and physcis , that this motion to not make a a treaty with the Russians to chop up the military budget in exchange for space flight to the moon, he thought , and Robert Kenney persuaded him , that if he didn't entertain the Russians , that perphaPS IT would be worse for American to not do itl.  In Kennedy's eyes , if it was possible to test the waters, on paper , then he would move in that hemisphere , if elected.  Of course it wasn't until he had taken office and then used the formal channels of the State Department to schedule a summit with Khrushchev.
But all that kinship and warming to Russians only then by coincidence , that mext APIL AFTER BEING SWORN IN FOR 6MONTHS,  the fiasco of the Bay of Pigs in April, however, coupled with Kennedy’s deep concern about the stability of the Southeast Asian country of Laos in the face of a Soviet-backed insurgency, the Kennedy brothers decided to explore the Russian love for secret back channels. Starting in late May 1961, Robert would meet at least 35 times—an extraordinary number—over the next 19 months with a Soviet intelligence officer named Georgi Bolshakov (of the military intelligence service, then as now called the GRU) to voice his brother’s hope for a lessening of tensions between the superpowers. Unsurprisingly, the press and public knew nothing about these meetings. But Kennedy also kept most of them a secret from the rest of his administration. National Security Adviser McGeorge Bundy would not know the extent of these meetings until three decades later. Kennedy’s most influential biographer, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., and his close aide and speechwriter Theodore Sorensen knew little of these contacts at the time. Robert often met with the Soviet agent in his office at DOJ; the FBI might have caught whiff of these tête-à-têtes, but the CIA was in the dark.
What we now know from these efforts is that John F. Kennedy was not only far less hawkish than his public rhetoric, but he was far less hawkish than the American people. He was certainly anti-communist and mistrusted pro-Kremlin revolutionaries, but he believed, as he would reveal publicly in his American University address in June 1963, that Americans had an irrational fear of Russians and that both peoples shared an aversion to nuclear war. It would take public acclaim of his leadership after the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962 for Kennedy to feel he had the political capital to tell the American people what they were not prepared to hear before. But long before then, the historical record now shows, he was willing to let the Soviets know his private views and explore a possible détente to lower the level of nuclear danger, while holding firm to American global security obligations.
The Kennedys loved keeping secrets, and they were good at it. They kept these meetings secret because JFK was trying to advance negotiating positions as trial balloons that he knew would be shot down if revealed prematurely in Washington. On the important matter of the number of on-site and at personal risk, to avoid mutual annihilation.


(J F K H A D H I S O W N R U S S I A N B A C K C H A N N E L . I T H E L P E D T O P R E V E N T W A R . JFK HAD HIS OWN RUSSIAN BACK CHANNEL. IT HELPED TO PREVENT WAR.)

SO thank goodness the Bushs had the United Nations to push pressure on the Soviets.  It Was Bush Senior , whom continue Inspections of suspicious seismic events in seismically active USSR, it was Bush who kept the the canine from eating the unexpected victim—Now this issue Kennedy , being a irrational , refers to the issue that kept the two sides from seriously negotiating a nuclear test ban in the Eisenhower years—Kennedy revealed to Moscow a private position of 10 inspections when the U.S. government’s public position was 20 inspections. “The USA could compromise,” RFK told his Soviet contact, “if this were in response to a Soviet proposal.” At the same time, the president’s brother underscored that an arms-control agreement would only come if the Soviets stopped underestimating U.S. power and causing trouble in divided Berlin and Southeast Asia. The Kennedys also refused to soften their hard line on Fidel Castro or even discuss it with Moscow. “Cuba is a dead issue,” explained RFK.
Some of this was naïve—Khrushchev did not want an arms-control agreement as much as Kennedy did and was suspicious of the president’s gesture— and all of it was politically dangerous at home for JFK. Had these secret discussions ever become public, RFK, let alone his brother, might well have been charged with being pro-Soviet esponiage. They weren’t, but in Washington at the time there was no acceptable difference between seeking compromise and being perceived as soft on the Soviets. In retrospect, however, it is hard to argue that these risks were not worth taking at the height of the Cold War. Robert’s secret meetings may not have made a major arms-control agreement more likely, but they certainly helped to make an accidental war less likely. At their one and only summit in Vienna in June 1961, Kennedy and Khrushchev agreed to a neutral Laos, a new status for the wartorn country that JFK had proposed earlier via the back channel. A few months later during the Berlin Crisis, when Soviet and American tanks were in a standoff at Checkpoint Charlie, RFK’s back-channeling may have been the reason the Kremlin withdrew its 30 tanks without incident. In the fall of 1962, when the Kennedy brothers suspected RFK’s interlocutor of having become a source of disinformation about Soviet missile activities in Cuba, they switched the back channel from Bolshakov to the Soviet ambassador, Anatoly Dobrynin. This secret contact, as many now know, would be influential in securing a peaceful end to the Cuban Missile Crisis. The Kennedy brothers’ Russian conspiracy was designed  for personal benefit, and at personal risk, to also give him a way to test the limits of Soviet desire in avoiding the mutual annihilation that seemed so plausible at the time. You see the Kennedy brother thought just how trumps, thinks, that having a friendship with the Russians would lead to a personal benefit, but of course to the untrained Kennedy , like the untrained Trump , it sounds all well and good, personal benefit should be derived by one whom you treat nicely, but that is all never understood by the ourtsider  which is exactly what Kennedy and Trump are, out siders....
It is really and gets ever more spooky but
Trump’s America. is like dejavu of the Kennedy administration.  The same demeanor of Kennedy And Trump have when it comes to not knowing the art of the KGB.  The Idea that both Tump and Kenndy have is a naïve component due to their lack of experience in dealing with the enemy, you have to understand how the Soviets operate , you see over the last decade the United States has tried to concentrate peace and commune with the Russians, but remember what Stalin says as their form of attack , he say  The capitalistic countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we will smash them with our clenched fist.



but after 11 years, and 6 different peace agreements,  .being fucked over and lied too, 6 different times, It is only known to wise and few, the guys in pentagon whom have walked not only down   the same road , and so path for far too long where we have been usurped and used as catalyst with this deranged idea of Trump/Tillerson/Obama the 3Russian M uskateers , All 3 of  them WANTING TO HUG Vlad putin and call him daddy.....,  IT WAS ONLY MITT ROMNEY WHOM




(J F K H A D H I S O W N R U S S I A N B A C K C H A N N E L . I T H E L P E D T O P R E V E N T W A R . JFK HAD HIS OWN RUSSIAN BACK CHANNEL. IT HELPED TO PREVENT WAR.)

JFK has long been something of a puzzle. He was a liberal who dragged his feet on civil rights until his third year in office and then embraced the struggle as a moral imperative—consciously forsaking the Democratic Party’s base in the segregationist South. In the mosaic of new information about his presidency, we can see patterns. Kennedy sought liberal outcomes while abhorring instability and uncertainty. But, in the end, he could and would take risks. He assumed his Russian outreach would have to remain secret, not only to satisfy the Soviets that it was not a publicity trick, but to give him time to sway American public opinion for whatever agreement that would follow.
Six decades later the FBI believes there is probable cause to investigate the potential relationship, and denial thereof, between Russia and the winner of the most recent presidential election. It is very human—and sometimes politically useful—to see parallels in history. But any comparison between these two cases requires first asking the simple question: Who benefits? Given the financial entanglements and conflicts of interests surrounding this president, and the activities of the Russian government in trying to bring him into office, such a relationship, if it exists, is likely to be revealed as very different from the one encouraged by the Kennedys years ago. In the 1960s, we know now, a president and his closest adviser took creative and audacious steps to make the world a safer place.

Putin boasts Russia has 'invincible' nuclear weapon that can hit anywhere in world and can't be stopped

Speaking about the future of Russian military power, Putin warned America that his country would not be "contained by warmongers"

• 18SHARES
• 8COMMENTS

By

Oliver Milne

• 10:34, 1 MAR 2018
• UPDATED11:42, 1 MAR 2018

NEWS

Loaded: 0%

Progress: 0%

Remaining Time-2:09

WATCH NEXTVladimir Putin boosts military firepower on Russian border with North Korea amid fears of imminent war

SHARE THIS VIDEO

 

 

WATCH NEXT

Russian hacker claims he's targeted computers in London and US - including Clinton's campaign - 'on Kremlin's orders'

• 18SHARES
• 8

Get Daily updates directly to your inbox

President Vladimir Putin says Russia has tested an array of new "invincible" nuclear weapons that are “invulnerable to enemy interception"

Speaking about the future of Russian military power, Putin warned America that his country would not be "contained by warmongers".

He revealed footage of long range intercontinental ballistic missiles he claimed could reach "anywhere in the world".

The president also warned that the weapon could be potentially undetectable to the anti-missile systems used by the American military.

Putin also sent a direct warning to the USA, who last year loosened it's guidelines for the use of nukes on the battlefield.

He said: "We will consider any use of nuclear weapons against Russia or her allies as a nuclear attack on our country. Response will be instantaneous with all ensuing consequences."

Putin warned that Russia could not take its current position in the world for granted (Image: TASS)

Powered by DNSUnlocker

The announcement was made that Russia had new ballistic missiles, capable of carrying a nuclear warhead (Image: Getty Images Europe)

Putin claims latest weapon his 'undetectable' (Image: Russian Military)

READ MORE

• Syria gas attack: Helicopters 'sent by Assad regime' drop chlorine barrel bombs on civilians

Using grand video presentations, the Russian autocrat claimed the Russian military had developed an underwater drone, capable of delivering smaller nuclear warheads to naval battles.

His speech purposefully raised the stakes in ongoing global nuclear tensions.

He said: "Nobody wanted to talk to us. Now listen to us.

"Containment of Russia didn’t succeed. It's time to recognize that reality. This isn't a bluff."

"We've done a lot to strengthen our army and navy and they are equipped with modern weaponry."

"We've adopted 300 new models of weaponry providing our armed forces with 18 new ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles), two submarine-based ballistic missiles, we've commissioned three new nuclear submarines and ... We've increased the number of high-precision long-range missiles."

Putin made the bellicose statements in a speech to Russian lawmakers (Image: REX/Shutterstock)

Putin claims that the missile is 'undetectable'

READ MORE

• Russian hackers infiltrated highest offices of German government for up to a year

Putin's speech comes on the same day that a top British Army official warned that more cash was needed to deal with an expansionist Russia.

In an interview with the Times, General Sir Gordon Messenger also warned that there are capabilities being produced by countries which could harm the UK.

"We should be making the case for a bigger defence budget in order to respond to those types of threats that are changing all of the time," he added.

Russian President Vladimir Putin walks before his annual state of the nation address to the Federal Assembly (Image: REX/Shutterstock)

Putin said he was increasing the defence capabilities of Russia (Image: TASS)

The President said the country was strengthening its power in land, sea and air (Image: Russian Ministry of Defence /Youtube)

READ MORE

• Russian state media uses VIDEO GAME footage in news report on war in Syria

Gen Messenger warned how more cash was needed to match the expanding capabilities and weapons being developed by states such as Vladimir Putin's Russia.

Putin's speech, which comes 17 days ahead of Russian elections, said Russia was strengthening its military position around the world.

CLICK TO PLAY

THE NEWS EXPLAINED - WHO IS VLADIMIR PUTIN AND HOW DOES HE MAINTAIN POWER IN RUSSIA?

He said that Russia's operations in Syria - supporting the Assad government's fight against rebels - showed the country's increased defence capabilities.

And promised to build a bridge to the Crimean peninsula within the next couple of months.

Crimea, which is part of Ukraine, was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014.

Putin's speech comes as nuclear tension across the globe are on the increase (Image: Getty)

The speech came 17 days before the election (Image: TASS)

Putin said that American containment of Russia had failed and that they should 'retire the warmongers' (Image: REX/Shutterstock)

READ MORE

• Royal Navy warship HMS Sutherland to sail through South China Sea in move set to rile Beijing

The speech also saw Putin comment on a range of domestic Russian issues - including more funding for research into artificial intelligence and a commitment to reduce poverty.

He said: "Russia is now a leading country with a powerful foreign economic and defence potential.

But from the point of view of the extremely important task of ensuring people's quality of life and welfare we, of course, have not achieved the level we require. But we have to do this and will do this."