Friday, March 18, 2016

This is news? Over 100% of the voters voted for Obama in Philly. How many other cities did this happen in and nothing was mentioned in the media let alone followed up by an election committee? me too neither "Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud" SHOCKER!!!

My country has been brought to its knees by the criminals of the Democratic Party. How do we ever recover from this past 7 years and return to the a baseline of honesty and responsibility to our family, community and country again


ACORN IS THE COMMUNITY ACTIVIST GROUP THAT OBAMA WORKED WITH IN CHICAGO. ACORN HAS SINCE DISBANDED. AFTER THE ELECTION, OVER 100 PEOPLE ASSOCIATED WITH ACORN HAVE BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF VOTER FRAUD. IN NY, FLA, NJ, ILLINOIS, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, TEXAS, NEVADA, AND CALIFORNIA, MANY DEMOCRATS INVOLVED WITH OBAMAS CAMPAIGN WERE ALSO ARRESTED AND FOUND GUILTY OF VOTER FRAUD.

IN THE 2008 ELECTIONS, ACORN EMPLOYEES, WITH HELP FROM STATE EMPLOYEES WHO WORKED IN THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, FRAUDULENTLY ADDED SIGNATURES TO THE REGISTRATION TO GET OBAMA'S NAME LISTED DURING THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY FOR PRESIDENT. IF HIS NAME HAD NOT BEEN ADDED, CLINTON WOULD HAVE WON THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY AND SHE WOULD HAVE RUN AGAINST JOHN MCCAIN. THE PEOPLE WHO DID THIS HAVE SINCE GONE TO PRISON. SO WHY HAS HE BEEN ALLOWED TO REMAIN PRESIDENT.
IN 2012, THE UN WANTED TO SEND ELECTION OFFICIALS TO EVERY DEMOCRATIC HELD STATE, TO ENSURE THAT OUR ELECTION WAS HONEST, OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY SAID NO.

ALREADY, IN NEVADA, CALIFORNIA, TX AND OHIO, LAWYERS WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAVE BEEN ACCUSED OF ELECTION REGISTRATION FRAUD. THEY ARE ILLEGALLY ADDING NAMES TO ELECTION ROLLS. IN TWO CASES IN NEVADA, ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WERE REGISTERRED AS CITIZENS. THESE PEOPLE WERE ALSO TELLONG REGISTERRING ILLEGALS THAT BY LAW THEY HAD TO VOTE FOR CLINTON IN 2016, OR THEY WOULD BE DEPORTED. 

THIS IS WHY DEMOCRATS FIGHT SO HARD TO PREVENT VOTER ID LAWS.

FOR THIS REASON ALONE PEOPLE SHOULD VOTE FOR TRUMP. HE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO WILL HAVE NO DONORS. HE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO WILL NOT BE PART OF THE CORRUPTION IN DC.Remember, Obama blocked the overseas military vote, same as what Al Gore tried to do until the Supreme Court intervened and allowed those votes to be countedThere were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep on giving, despite the long-term unsustainability.

In spite of those odds, polls indicated that Romney was going to win the election. The economy is close to Great Depression era conditions, and unemployment is almost as high as when Obama entered office. Economic conditions became so dire after Obama took office it prompted the rise of an entire new movement, the Tea Party. Presidents rarely win reelection when the economy is in the tank.

So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states. According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio's Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio's 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.

The inflated numbers can't just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by.

Videographer James O'Keefe, known for his undercover videos exposing left wing fraud, caught a Virginia Democratic Congressman's son on video in October explaining how to commit voter fraud. Patrick Moran, the son of Rep. Jim Moran, told O'Keefe's videographer that in order to make a vote for someone else, you'd need two pieces of identification, such as a utility bill, explaining, "they can fake a utility bill with ease, you know?" He went on to advise the videographer that he should also call the voter and pretend to be a polling company in order to make sure the voter isn't intending to vote. He said that Democrat attorneys would be located in the polling places to assist him if challenged casting one of these illegal votes.

In another video, O'Keefe's videographer tells a DNC staffer from Obama's Organizing for America that she intends to vote in both Texas and Florida. The staffer laughs and says, "It's cool." The staffer then prints out a voter registration form for the undercover videographer and advises her on what to do if she gets caught.

These are just the known instances of attempted voter fraud. How many instances occurred that were not discovered? Obama's Organizing for America looked up voters in swing states – many who would not have bothered voting otherwise – and got them to vote. How did they get them to vote? They may have given them rides to the polls, they may have offered to fill out and return their ballots for them, or they may have voted ballots for the ones who were not going to vote.

Many on the left believe there is nothing wrong with committing fraud in order to ensure Obama's reelection. It is a common tenet on the left that the ends justify the means. Saul Alinsky, the 1960's radical who inspired Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, taught community organizers like Obama that dishonesty is acceptable if it achieves your political goals. And when caught, Alinsky teaches radicals to deny the wrongdoing and change the topic to put their accusers on the defensive. One Obama supporter brazenly posted on Facebook that he was voting four times for Obama, asserting that the ends justify the means.

Aiding Obama's win was a devious suppression of the conservative vote. The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased drastically since 2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for overseas military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.

Voter fraud has been in the works for years. At least 52 employees of the left wing group ACORN have been convicted of voter registration fraud. ACORN itself was convicted of the crime of "compensation," paying its registration canvassers bonuses to exceed their quotas. In 2008, 36% of ACORN's voter registrations were invalidated. Left wing political pundit Chris Matthews admitted last year that pretending to call someone from a polling company, then voting their ballot for them, has been happening in big cities since the 1950's. He admitted he knows that kind of voter fraud takes place in Philadelphia.

Strong-arming people into voting who really have no desire to vote undermines our form of government. People do not choose to vote because they are uninformed about the issues and candidates, are lazy, cynical, or are content with the status quo. Voting someone else's ballot for them is cheating the system and essentially giving yourself two votes.

This is news? Over 100% of the voters voted for Obama in Philly. How many other cities did this happen in and nothing was mentioned in the media let alone followed up by an election committee?
me too neither 
"Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud" SHOCKER!!!

Who knows who will be voting this year since people don't need a photo ID to vote?When people claim that Obama won because the economy was improving, or because Americans generally think he is doing a good job, it is not true. He won through dishonest methods and rhetoric. Many of the votes cast in the swing states were cajoled, some legally and perhaps even more illegally, into supporting him. If voter fraud becomes acceptable, then maybe Donald Trump is right: it's time for a revolution.


Yes it seems strange that in several precincts in Ohio and Florida, Obama got more votes than there are registered voters. It also seems strange that, in many precincts around Philadelphia, Romney didn't get a single vote. That is statistically impossible.

Voter fraud alone could not have secured the win for Obama. There were other factors. Those factors are government dependency, ignorance, spitefulness, misguided party loyalty and apathy. When you research all these factors, you will realize that he didn't even need voter fraud.

In past elections, and 2012 was no different, less than 50% of those eligible even bothered to vote. A majority of the people just don't care. As long as they can get a beer out of the refrigerator, sit in their easy chair and watch their precious sports on their big screen televisions they couldn't care less about anything else. When you try to enlighten them, they refuse to talk about it because it's too depressing.
Most everyone suspected fraud, but these numbers prove it and our government and media refuse to do anything about it.

As each state reported their final election details, the evidence of voter fraud is astounding. Massive voter fraud has been reported in areas of OH and FL, with PA, WI and VA, all are deploying personnel to investigate election results.

Here are just a few examples of what has surfaced with much more to come.

* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).

* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).

* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters.

* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.

* The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.

* Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.

* In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters.

NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote.
 

Origins:   Claims of fraud have arisen after each of the last several U.S. presidential elections, especially since the 2000 election, the outcome of which hinged on a prolonged dispute over a victory margin of just 537 votes in the state of Florida. As the example cited above demonstrates, the election of 2012 was no exception in that regard. 

But whatever voter fraud (if any) might have occurred during the 2012 presidential election, none is evidenced by the example reproduced here. As shown below, all of the statements it comprises are demonstrably false: 
 



  • In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).
  • It is true that 59 voting divisions in Philadelphia recorded no votes for Mitt Romney, but given the voter composition of the Philadelphia area (and some Philadelphia wards in particular) and the number of voters in each division, that outcome was hardly a "mathematical and statistical impossibility." 

    Barack Obama won the overall vote in the Philadelphia area by an 85% to 14% margin over Mitt Romney; Obama also received greater than 90% of the vote in more than half of Philadelphia's66 wards, and 99% or more of the vote in seven of those wards. That result was hardly surprising given that, as the Philadelphia Inquirer noted, those wards are "clustered in almost exclusively black sections of West and North Philadelphia" and "nationally, 93 percent of African Americans voted for Obama." The Philadelphia wards that trended very heavily for Barack Obama included many divisions of between 200 and 500 voters in which Mitt Romney received a scant handful of votes (and sometimes no votes at all), a result mirroring that of the previous election, in which Republican candidate John McCain "got zero votes in 57 Philadelphia voting divisions." 

    When the Inquirer went looking for Republican voters in some of those divisions, they couldn't find any: 

    Many parts of Philadelphia and other big cities simply lack Republican voters, a fact of campaigning that has been true since Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, Jonathan Rodden, a political science professor at Stanford University, said.

    Although voter registration lists, which often contain outdated information, show12 Republicans live in the [28th] ward's third division, The Inquirer was unable to find any of them by calling or visiting their homes.

    Four of the registered Republicans no longer lived there; four others didn't answer their doors. City Board of Elections registration data say a registered Republican used to live at 25th and York Streets, but none of the neighbors across the street knew him.

    James Norris, 19, who lives down the street, is listed as a Republican in city data. But he said he's a Democrat and voted for Obama because he thinks the president will help the middle class.

    A few blocks away, Eric Sapp, a 42-year-old chef, looked skeptical when told that city data had him listed as a registered Republican. "I got to check on that," said Sapp, who voted for Obama.

    Eighteen Republicans reportedly live in the nearby 15th Division, according to city registration records. The 15th has the distinction of pitching two straight Republican shutouts — zero votes for McCain in 2008, zero for Romney. Oh, and 13 other city divisions did the same thing in 2008 and 2012.

    Three of the 15th's registered Republicans were listed as living in the same apartment, but the tenant there said he had never heard of them. The addresses of several others could not be found.

    On West Albert Street, Duke Dunston says he knows he's a registered Republican, but he's never voted for one.
    Thus the results in Philadelphia were reflective not of an "impossible" statistical anomaly but rather of a general historical trend widely seen throughout the city. 
     



  • In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations — and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).
  • precinct-by-precinct breakdown of the official voting results from Wood County, Ohio, for the 2012 election shows that Barack Obama received nowhere close to 100% of the votes cast in any of that county's 97 precincts. The highest percentage he achieved in any one precinct was 75.5%. 
     



  • In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters.
  • The official Voter Turnout statistics for Ohio show Wood County recorded a total turnout of 64,342 voters, an amount far smaller than the number of registered voters in that county (108,014). 
     



  • In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.
  • This statement demonstrates a misunderstanding between the difference in "number of votes" cast and "number of cards" cast. The official election results from St. Lucie County, Florida, show, a total of 123,301 votes were cast for the office of President of the United States, but a total of 247,383 cards were cast because St. Lucie County used a two-page ballot (i.e., a ballot consisting of two cards), so every voter who returned both pages of his ballot cast two cards. 

    As the web site of that county's elections board explains: "Turnout percentages will show over 100% due to a two page ballot. The tabulation system (GEMS) provides voter turnout as equal to the total cards cast in the election divided by the number of registered voters. Also note that some voters chose not to return by mail the second card." 
     



  • The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.
  • This entry repeats the same error as the previous one. The National SEAL Museum polling location inSt. Lucie County had a turnout of 2756 registered voters, but a total of 4469 cards were cast because each voter's ballot consisted of two cards. The official vote count from that location for the office of President of the United States recorded 1,473 votes for Mitt Romney and 754 votes for Barack Obama. 
     



  • Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.
  • The official results for the 2012 general election for Palm Beach County, Florida, show that 605,268 out of 870,182 registered voters cast ballots for the office of President of the United States, a voter turnout rate of 69.56%, not 141%. 
     



  • In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters.
  • This statement is ambiguous because multiple states (Kentucky, Indiana, and West Virginia) have counties named Ohio. Nonetheless, this statement is false regardless of which of those counties is considered: 

    Mitt Romney won Ohio County, Kentucky, by a 67% to 31% margin. 
    Mitt Romney won Ohio County, Indiana, by a 63% to 35% margin. 
    Mitt Romney won Ohio County, West Virginia, by a 60% to 38% margin. 
     



  • Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote.
  • In the 2012 presidential election, Barack Obama did lose in every state that required all voters to provide photo ID, but those states were only four in number: Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, and Tennessee. Meanwhile, contrary to what is claimed here, he also lost in many states that did not require all voters to provide photo ID: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. 

    (NOTE: If you do not live in Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, or Tennessee, then your state did not require all voters to provide photo ID during the 2012 general election. As shown on a chart of Voter Identification Requirements by state, only those four states had strict photo ID laws in place during the 2012 general election. All other states either did not require voters to provide ID or accepted some forms of non-photo ID.) 

    No comments:

    Post a Comment