Thursday, March 3, 2016

February of 1923, Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he becomes a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by criticizing the work of Schrodinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumes his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World Government. In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for either. In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World Government, with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continues through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically, is offered the presidency of Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends his time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists such as J. Robert Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy trials.

Up until the 20th century, innate talent was necessary for leadership in the physical sciences
but, with the introduction of Dr. Einstein's work, it became possible for the untalented majority to 
gain ascendancy. The same intellectual takeover occurred after World War II in Engineering and the 
costs and failure rates of sophisticated projects greatly increased. (It is fortunate for the USA that 
this effect did not take place earlier or the war is likely to have been lost.) Admittedly, engineering 
has accomplished a great deal since that time but at an excessive cost in money and time. It is no 
accident that, when a project such as the development of the U-2 aircraft is required, the work is 
performed in a skunk works, it is not performed in a mainstream organization. (The one statement 
that the author can quote verbatim from a college instructor after almost 50 years is that "an idiot 
can do anything that an engineer can, the difference is that it will take three time as long and cost 
five times as much".) In the basic sciences the situation is much worse. While anyone can tell 
whether an airplane flies, they cannot tell whether there is a wormhole in space or whether the Law 
of Conservation of Energy is consistent with the gravitational field. The end result is that the rules 
of a religion have been imposed on the physical sciences and those sciences have been degraded 
to a level analogous to that of a medieval theology which, as mentioned, debated the number of 
angels who could dance on the head of a pin. It is no accident that the PC industry was started by 
two men working in a garage rather than by a huge corporation. 

16.7- The selection and training of talented individuals is a difficult process. They can only be 
identified by their ability to arrive at valid results by unanticipated, and perhaps incomprehensible 
routes. The conventional educational approach in the sciences and the technologies is to attempt 
break those individuals away from their unorthodox thought processes and force them to conform 
to accepted practices and ideas rather than to recognize their talent and assist them in its 
development. Talent in both the physical sciences and in technology operates by making use of the 
pattern recognition capability of the mind and, because it operates in the background, the individual 
possessing the talent is normally unaware of the thought processes involved and ascribes their 
results to intuition. Depending upon the lifelong personality of the individual, the innate level of that 
talent and the discipline that he has exerted in training it, the reliability of an individual's intuition 
varies from zero to perfection. As is the case with a computer, GIGO applies. In order for the pattern 
recognizing capability of his brain to be effective in the solution of physical problems it is 
necessary for an individual to have accepted a certain set of learning rules for himself. These rules 
are: 

• Everything he accepts as true must agree with everything else that he accepts as true. 

o In the event of contradiction, the validity of the relevant information, both old and new, 
must be considered to be tentative. 

o If the information is more than trivially important, the necessary effort must be made to 
resolve any inconsistencies by correcting the new and/or the old information. 

o The more items of information processed in this manner, the closer one's store of 
knowledge will approach absolute validity. (It will never be perfect, no one lives that 
long.) 

• One must never assume that his source of information, no matter how revered, is correct. 



o Where necessary in an academic or business situation, one must keep two sets of 
books. One set of books must contain the information expected by the individuals 
possessing power over your future and the other set must contain the information you 
have determined to be true. 

• One must never allow himself to be brainwashed or bullied into not following the preceding 
rules. 

If an individual follows these rules from an early age, he will find that his intuition, also known as 
common sense, will be extremely reliable and will provide him with information long before he 
understands it consciously. As a bonus, the information will be correctly labeled as to its reliability. 
Intuition only yields faulty results if an individual has failed to adequately follow the rules described 
above. 

16.8- Is the information presented in this book more nearly correct than presently accepted 
concepts? The author believes that it is for the simple reason that he can find no contradiction 
between the various items of information involved. On the other hand, the presently accepted 
concepts are severely inconsistent. They are as full of holes as lacy swiss cheese. Will the material 
that the author has provided require improvement and correction? Certainly it will, no one can 
cover this much material without error. As to where our understanding of reality will lead, only time 
will tell. Unfortunately the author's age insures that he will not be around to see the results. 

16.9- Common Sense is another name for intelligence. While mathematics and experimentation 
require intelligence for their development, their usage does not directly involve intelligence. In their 
application, they are merely tools which must be used as an adjunct to intelligence. 

In 1938 Professor Einstein immigrated to the United States where he continued his research on the transport of sediment, first at the U.S. Agricultural 
Experiment Station at Clemson, South Carolina (1938-1943), and later (1943-1947) at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative Laboratory, California 
Institute of Technology. These years of research culminated in the classic Department of Agriculture Technical Publication No. 1026, The Bed-Load Function 
for Sediment Transportation in Open Channel Flows. 

Professor Einstein joined the faculty of the University of California in 1947 as Associate Professor, and later became Professor of Hydraulic Engineering. He 
possessed the rare combination of a highly competent research scientist, a fine practicing engineer, and an excellent teacher in both the graduate and 
undergraduate areas of instruction. To recognize the many valuable contributions of Professor Einstein in research and teaching, his many former students 
organized in his honor a symposium on sedimentation on the Berkeley campus upon his retirement in 1970. The proceedings of this symposium resulted in the 
book, Sedimentation, in 1971. 

Professor Einstein's extracurricular activities were diverse and numerous. He loved sailing and music. No day was too rough on San Francisco Bay to prevent 
him from heading out through the entrance of the Berkeley Yacht Harbor for a period of excitement and relaxation on the Bay. 

Professor Einstein was extremely generous with his time-whether in conferences with his many graduate students, teaching for brief periods at foreign 
universities, or advising countries around the world on solutions to critical sedimentation problems. On one such occasion in late June 1973, he was at the 
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, giving lectures and participating in research when at lunch he suffered a heart attack from 
which he did not recover and died July 26, 1973. Early after his arrival at Woods Hole he expressed his admiration of the beauty and serenity of this small 
seaside town-his family therefore chose the small cemetery overlooking the harbor as his final resting place. 

Widowed in 1958 by the death of his first wife, Professor Einstein married Elizabeth Roboz, then a biochemist at Stanford Medical School, and later Clinical 
Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center. 

By students, friends, and colleagues, Hans Albert Einstein's name will be recalled with warmth throughout the world. He offered encouragement and patient 
assistance to his students, and through his contacts with students, teachers, and engineers, he had great influence on the scientific development of the hydraulics 
of sedimentation in foreign countries as well as in the United States. As an example of the many letters received by the Department from former graduate 
students, one student observed, "The picture of his well built and smiling figure striding across the Hydraulic Laboratory still hovers in my mind and before my 
eyes. We will always cherish those sweet memories." 

Among Professor Einstein's numerous honors and awards were a Guggenheim Fellowship (1953), research awards from the American Society of Civil 
Engineers (1959 and 1960), The Berkeley Citation from the University of California (1971), the Certificate of Merit from the U.S. Department of Agriculture 
(1971), and a certificate of recognition for more than twenty years of devoted and distinguished service to Applied Mechanics Reviews by the American Society 
of Mechanical Engineers (1972). 
J. W. Johnson 
D. K. Todd 
R. L. Wiegel 



Separatist Brief Table of Contents I CSCS Homepage 

Albert Einstein: A Jewish Myth 

by Dr. Paul Bowers, B.S., M.E., Ch.D. 

One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish media is the following 
from Mein Kampf, 1:10: 

"The great masses of people ... will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small 
one." 

Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray this statement as Hitler's own, 
personal philosophy or strategy. But if we read this selection in context, we find that he is 
speaking of the Jews who had ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how the German 
people fell victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler even tells us what this great lie is that 
duped the German people into being controlled by the Jews. He continues: 

"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the application of untruth and 
defamation, however, were at all times the Jews; for their entire existence is built on one 
single great lie, namely, that here one had to deal with a religious brotherhood, while in 
fact one has to deal with a race - what a race! As such they have been nailed down 
forever, in an eternally correct sentence of fundamental truth, by one of the greatest 
minds of mankind; he called them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does not realize 
this or does not want to believe this will never be able to help truth to victory in this 
world." 

Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th century German 
philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true nature of Jews. We do not need to rely upon 
the opinions of German philosophers and political leaders regarding this character trait of the 
Jews, for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews, 

"You are of your father the D iabolical ne, and the lusts of your father you w ish to 
do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and he has notstood in the truth 
because there is no truth in him.W hen he speaks a lie, he speaks ofhis own, because 
he is a liar, and the father of it" (John 8:44 AST). 

Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing myths" (Titus 1:14). But 
Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed Germany and what have destroyed America today. 
Herr Hitler may have been correct in what he felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there are 
many, many more which have had a damning effect on the white race. One of the greatest is 
certainly the lie of the Hebrew Masoretic Text and the removal of the Greek Septuagint from 
the hands of white Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the same poisonous venom. 
One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is Albert Einstein. 

Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius who drastically changed the field 



of theoretical physics. As such, he is made an idol to young people and his very name has 
become synonymous with genius. The truth, however, is very different. The reality is that 
Einstein was an inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed 
nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary he 
stole the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made him a hero. 

When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only brilliance lies in his 
ability to plagiarize and steal other people's ideas, passing them off as his own. 

Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story. The Encyclopedia 
Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also 
says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school 
with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and 
practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in 
Zurich. This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to 
be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a 
stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he 
still could not get a position at the engineering school! Unable to go to the school as he had 
wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a 
technical expert third class, which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified 
position. Even after publishing his so-called groundbreaking papers of 1905 and after working 
in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, 
the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not 
quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents 
of every day things; yet he was barely qualified. 

He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position 
at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth. 
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of 
graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic 
setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical 
physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905. Many people have recognized the 
impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to 
believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is 
the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such 
documents at the age of 26 without any real education. However, a simpler explanation exists: 
he stole the ideas and plagiarized the papers. 

Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be 
remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshippers as totally new and 
completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers 
dealt with the following four ideas, respectively: 

1 . The foundation of the photon theory of light; 

2. The equivalence of energy and mass; 



3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids; 

4. The special theory of relativity. 

Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps the most 
famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein 
called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915). This theory 
contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises: 1) in the 
absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and 2) since the speed 
of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is 
longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for 
an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same place. This is basically the 
idea that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to 
slower velocities where time would pass faster. 

This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But 
these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's. First of all, the idea that the speed of 
light was a constant and was independent of the motion of its source was not Einstein's at all, 
but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James Maxwell. Maxwell studied the phenomenon of 
light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He wrote an article to 
this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much 
debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific community, 
particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of light 
was independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of 
Relativity was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper. 

This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important 
experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They 
observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity. They had 
attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be 
necessary for the propagation of light. 

In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George FitzGerald, who had also first 
proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of 
the Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained if, 

"... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving through the ether 
or across it, by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that 
of light." 

This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper! 

Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands, proposed the same solution and 
began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald 
worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing 
what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In 1898, the Irishman Joseph 
Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its relativistic 
consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz transformations, the series of 



equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, 
the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity 
of light. In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper regarding the Special Theory of 
Relativity had already been published. 

The Frenchman Poincare had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He stated 
seven years before Einstein's paper that, 

"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity 
of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of two time 
intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as 
simple as possible." 

Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the 
lack of originality on the part of Einstein. Thus we see that the only thing original about the 
paper was the term 'Special Theory of Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over the 
next few years, Poincare became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding 
relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while 
Poincare was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding relativity, 
Einstein was still working in the patent office in Bern and no one in the academic community 
thought it necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early 
physicists knew that he was a fraud. 

This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another of Einstein's 1905 
papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal 
energy of the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement had first 
been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this 
phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs 
and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In 
fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, 
k. Between these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper 
regarding Brownian motion. 

The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper published by 
Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc A 2. Einstein's 
biographers categorize this as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though 
this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in 
that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass 
equivalence was not original with Einstein. 

That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the laboratory in 
the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Gottingen. In 1900, 
Poincare had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just 
electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich 
Hasenchrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era. Hasenchrl was the 
teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety of 
topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years and 



had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would 
publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenorhl had 
received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences. 

Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple deduction from 
the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long 
understood that the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc A 2 was the 
logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it. Thus, the experiments of 
Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally, and most importantly, Hasenorhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. 
It is ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this postulate, particularly in light of the fact 
that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments. 

In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific community, "Perhaps 
it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high 
degree (e.g., salts of radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about 
science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really 
did not understand basic scientific principles and that he was writing about a topic that he did 
not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment 
"lies beyond the realm of possible experience." 

The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of the photon theory of 
light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release of 
electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is 
particularly important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he unjustly received 
his 1922 Nobel Prize. 

But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck who deserve the credit. The 
main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted 
and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric 
effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, 
including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon. Lenard was the first to 
show that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect was not governed by 
the intensity of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was an important breakthrough. 

Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day quantum theory. By 
1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was 
absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and 
Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one particular type of 
energy - light energy. But the principles and equations governing the process in general had 
been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of 
Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this 
paper of Einstein's was original. 

After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community took little notice 
and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909 when it was arranged for him to 
take a position at a school by World Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919 newspaper headline that 
he gained any notoriety. 



With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position where he could 
begin to use other people's work as his own more openly. He engaged many of his students to 
look for ways to prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those 
theories, and then he could present the research as his own or at least take partial credit. In this 
vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently 
developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity. This was the beginning of 
his General Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915. But the mathematical work 
was not done by Einstein - he was incapable of it. Instead, it was performed by the 
mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles developed by 
Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the 
basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity. 

The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the universe; that is, to 
the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as 
they pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work 
which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper was filled 
with errors and the conclusions were incorrect. It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough 
to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General 
Theory. Einstein published his correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to 
its publication that he, "...completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is 
referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and 
Felix Klein, another mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area 
of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein. 

Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe that Einstein had 
changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced 
them in their thinking. However, the exact opposite is true. Einstein stole the majority of his 
General Relativity work from these two men, the rest being taken from Grossmann. Hilbert 
submitted for publication, a week before Einstein completed his work, a paper which contained 
the correct field equations of General Relativity. What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically 
the exact same paper, with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had 
an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were Jewish friends of his 
working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in 
advance of publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the 
form of a lecture. 

Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his 
paper on November 20 in Gottingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein 
thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in 
fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either 
of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of 
his. Therefore, this serves as incontrovertible proof that Einstein quickly plagiarized the work 
and then presented it, hoping to beat Hilbert to the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein 
publicly began to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an 
effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein 



this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first. 

Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher quality than Einstein's. It 
is known today that there are many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General 
Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the 
forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of 
Erwin Schrodinger, whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics. 

That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by 
Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German 
physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, 
Hasenchrl, Poincare , etc., had created the foundations of the theory of relativity..." 

However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not 
promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert 
Einstein. As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in 
plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a 
massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to 
the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the General 
Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity 
to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert. 

On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of which proclaimed, 
"Revolution in science - New theory of the Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was 
the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following years, 
Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator 
of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein 
received the Nobel Prize for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the photoelectric effect. 

The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an important coup for 
world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the popular 
masses of England and America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he is 
erroneously believed to be today. As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World 
Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to change our 
fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions 
regarding political and social issues. This is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its 
ongoing effort of social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert to 
be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a strong German, Christian 
background. His grandfather's two middle names were 'Firchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, 
Live Right.' In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf 
Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along 
with other leading German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the 
Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved. 

The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either. This German's 
grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German theologians, and during World 
War II he would stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he 



could. 

The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrodinger to be heralded as a 
genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in 
Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's 
work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it had been 
criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not understand it. 

The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius, even though he 
would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his 
famous uncertainty principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and the 
binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry. No, the Jews did not want Heisenberg 
promoted as a genius because he would go on to head the German atomic bomb project and 
serve prison time after the war for his involvement with the Third Reich. 

No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of white Germans, Austrians, 
Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the 
body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, 
they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often 
embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he had 
supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article in 
which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the 
"energy of the atom." The article says, 

"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will 
someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to drive a great steamship across the 
ocean on a pint of water, for instance-then, according to Einstein, you are wrong..." 

Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had supposedly founded, 
though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical research was underway that would lead to 
the atomic bomb and nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he 
made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose - 
evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles 
after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in each instance, 
Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles; he was merely 
recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of 
academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism. 

In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a fund-raising tour for the Hebrew 
University in Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to 
gain membership in a Commission of the League of Nations, today Known as the United Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein 
visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he becomes a founding member of the 
Association of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist 
and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by criticizing the work of 
Schrodinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumes his Zionistic agenda, wanting 
an independent Israel and at the same time a World Government. 



In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he would reverse this 
position during World War II when he advocated war against Germany and the creation of the 
atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the 
request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an 
atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual 
construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for either. 

In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World Government, with Israel 
apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continues through the rest of the 1940s. 
In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of Israel, both 
politically and economically, is offered the presidency of Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends 
his time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists such as J. Robert 
Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy trials. Finally, on 
April 18, 1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue dies. 

Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid statements. His death was 
just the beginning of his usage and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media 
continued to promote the myth of this Super- Jew long after his death, and as more and more of 
the men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his myth 
and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew controlled Time magazine 
naming Einstein "The Person of the Century" at the close of 1999. It may be demonstrated that 
the Jewish lies have become more bold with the passage of time because Einstein was never 
named "Man of the Year" while he was alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he is 
named "Person of the Century." 

Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the "Person of the Century," 
Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year" while he was still living by Time 
magazine, and according to a December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was 
chosen over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that would 
accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top 
serious candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein, which has articles by 
men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. 
For one, they found it necessary to include an article rationalizing why they did not pick the 
obvious choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking which 
purports to be a history of the theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the things in 
this article, such as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before 
Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of relativity long before Einstein. 
Hawking also writes, 

"Einstein... was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul 
Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrodinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of 
reality called quantum mechanics. ... Einstein was horrified by this ... Most scientists, 
however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent 
agreement with observations ... They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, 
molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has 
transformed the world in the past half-century." 



This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of the modern 
developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so stupid as to be vehemently 
against the most important idea of modern science, just as he opposed Schrodinger's work in 
unified field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success 
eluded" Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum 
mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified field theory, but Einstein, 
who proves himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused to 
believe in either quantum theory or the unified field theory. 

To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most ludicrous and absurd lies of 
all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and 
Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title 
to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice would have been men like Hilbert, 
Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally 
changed the landscape of 20th century science, then the obvious choice would be William 
Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the transistor, which is the basis of all 
modern electronic devices and computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs 
and watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed incomprehensible advances in all 
fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms of science today would be basically in the 
same place that they were in the late 1940s. 

However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley because he spent the 
majority of his scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of non- whites 
and arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews to financially 
destroy Shockley who founded the first company in the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to 
develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used them to start Fairchild 
semiconductor, the company that today is known as Intel. 

No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be recognized, not the 
anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great German scientists who helped the National Socialists in 
Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and 
certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and geneticists of our time. 
Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything 
white. 

After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and of the Germans in 
particular in the following statements. He was asked what he thought about Germany and about 
re-educating the Germans after the war and said, 

"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870. ..Behind the Nazi 
party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his 
speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. 
... The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated 
to a democratic way of thinking and acting..." 

Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that this is the only way 



that they can be kept in check. He is right about one thing, the Germans did knowingly support 
the cause of National Socialism, but what Einstein is attacking is Christianity, because it was 
Christianity that led the German people to overwhelmingly support National Socialism. It was 
the German Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of men like Karl Lueger 
that led the German people to their understanding of Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has 
recently shown the Christian basis of National Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing 
Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, and the book Why The Jews? by Prager 
and Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what the Jews call 'anti-Semitism.' 
Einstein understood this and Einstein, like all Jews, hated Christianity. So what Einstein was 
really advocating was the killing and constraining of all true Christians, not just German 
Christians. This is the true purpose and intent of Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was 
merely a tool of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end. 

Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is the mortal enemy of mongrel 
Judaism. This is why the Jews, like Einstein, hated Nazi Germany so much, for National 
Socialist Germany advocated primitive, positive Christianity in the 24th point of its Party 
Platform. 

For more information, contact: 

CSCS, P.O. Box 188, Kodak, TN 37764 

www.christianseparatist.org 

Separatist Brief Table of Contents I CSCS Homepage 

1 comment:

  1. Using Car Rental 8 you can find the best car hire from over 50000 locations globally.

    ReplyDelete